‘Robert Brown’ Winter-hardy Hibiscus (Hibiscus ×moscheutos L.)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Additional index words.landscape plants, Malvaceae, ornamentals Winter-hardy hibiscuses are herbaceous, shrub-like perennials in the mallow (Malvaceae) family that belong to six species native to the United States and southern Canada (Lawton, 2004; Winters, 1970).They grow naturally in marshy habitats.Unlike their distant relative, H. rosa-sinensis, winter-hardy hibiscuses have a distinctive winter dormancy period, when the shoots die to the crown.In spring, new shoots are produced from buds associated with the crown.Winter-hardy hibiscuses, especially H. moscheutos and its hybrids, have attractive, tropical-looking flowers reaching up to 30 cm in diameter.Winter-hardy hibiscus species are long-day plants (Warner and Erwin, 2001) that abundantly produce flowers from midsummer through late fall.The flowers last 1 d and colors range from white through pink to red, depending on species, with a dark red or brown center eye.Recently developed cultivars such as 'Fantasia' (PP11,853) and 'Plum Crazy' (PP11,854) have lavender flowers.Cultivars with dual-color flowers are still rare but include 'Peppermint Schnapps' (PP18,939) and 'Turn of the Century'.'Robert Brown' has been released to provide a cultivar with a unique combination of red and white flower color, which has not been previously reported for winter-hardy hibiscus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".