Synthesis and Reactivity of a Terminal Scandium Imido Complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Preparation of a terminal scandium imido complex, 2 ·DMAP, was accomplished through thermolysis of an arylamido methyl complex, 1, stabilized by a bulky β-diketiminato ligand in the presence of 4- N, N -dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP). Mechanistic studies revealed that the reaction proceeds by initial metalation of 1, followed by rapid DMAP-promoted alkane elimination to generate the scandium imido complex. Kinetic studies of the reaction between separately synthesized metalate 3 and DMAP under pseudo-first-order conditions yielded activation parameters of Δ H ⧧ = 73.5(2) kJ mol –1 and Δ S ⧧ = −70.4(5) J K –1 mol –1 . The reaction of 2 ·DMAP with tert -butyl amine or phenylacetylene resulted in addition of the N–H or C–H bond across the scandium imide linkage, respectively, to furnish complexes endo- / exo -4 and endo -5 . These compounds were fully characterized, including via structural analysis, providing further evidence for the terminal scandium imido derivative 2 ·DMAP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".