MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Accumulation of technetium-99m glucarate: in vitro cell cultures and in vivo tumour models

2003· article· en· W2312317344 on OpenAlexaff
James R. Ballinger, Victor Hsue, Andrew M. Rauth

Bibliographic record

VenueNuclear Medicine Communications · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Canadian institutionsOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIn vivoIn vitroHypoxia (environmental)Cancer researchCell cultureChemistryPathologyTechnetium-99mCellPharmacologyMedicineBiologyScintigraphyBiochemistryNuclear medicineOxygen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

99mTc-glucarate is an investigational radiopharmaceutical which has been shown to accumulate in acute cerebral and myocardial injuries and in some tumours. In the present work, a survey of possible factors affecting the cellular accumulation of 99mTc-glucarate was carried out in cell lines and strains in vitro and in murine tumours in vivo. Accumulation was enhanced under hypoxic conditions in 12 of the 16 human and murine cell lines and strains studied, and inhibited in the presence of nitroimidazoles. At temperatures lower than 37 degrees C, accumulation was reduced, but a hypoxic/aerobic differential was maintained. Aerobic accumulation of 99mTc-glucarate was enhanced by cyanide. In transplanted tumours in mice, 99mTc-glucarate showed high tumour/muscle and tumour/blood ratios at early times after injection. Pharmacological enhancement of the extent of hypoxia by the administration of hydralazine or nitro-L-arginine resulted in significantly increased accumulation of 99mTc-glucarate in the tumour. The in vitro and in vivo properties of 99mTc-glucarate suggest that it may be useful for tumour imaging in the clinic, although the exact mechanism(s) by which it localizes in tumours remains unknown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.264
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNuclear Medicine CommunicationsSame topicRadiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207