ATHENEITE, [Pd2][As0.75Hg0.25], FROM ITABIRA, MINAS GERAIS, BRAZIL: CRYSTAL STRUCTURE AND REVISION OF THE CHEMICAL FORMULA
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The crystal structure of the rare mineral atheneite was solved using intensity data collected from a crystal from Itabira, Minas Gerais, Brazil. The structure is hexagonal, space group P 62 m, with a = 6.813(1), c = 3.4892(5) A and V = 140.26(4) A 3 . The refinement of an anisotropic model led to an R index of 7.26% for 261 independent reflections. The crystal structure strongly resembles that of synthetic MM’As compounds, with M = Ru, Rh, Pd, and M = 3 d transition element. There are two fully occupied Pd sites: site Pd1 has a ten-fold coordination, and Pd2, an eleven-fold coordination. The two As atoms in the structure have a tricapped trigonal prismatic coordination; As1 is filled by arsenic only, whereas As2 has an occupancy of 0.60 As and 0.40 Hg. The presence of Hg at the As2 site accounts for the longer distances observed. On the basis of information gained from this characterization, the crystal-chemical formula was revised according to the structural results, yielding Pd 2 [As 0.75 Hg 0.25 ] ( Z = 3) instead of (Pd,Hg) 3 As ( Z = 2) as previously reported. A recalculation of the chemical data listed in the scientific literature for atheneite according to the structural results obtained here leads to an excellent agreement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it