MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2312366560 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2012-4872

Abstract 4872: ICGC PedBrain Tumor - Next-generation sequencing identifies novel subgroup-specific mutations and copy number aberrations in medulloblastoma

2012· article· en· W2312366560 on OpenAlexaff
David Jones, Natalie Jäger, Yoon‐Jae Cho, Trevor J. Pugh, Tobias Rausch, Adrian M Stuetz, Thomas Zichner, Joachim Weischenfeldt, Marc Zapatka, Vladimı́r Beneš, Jonathon Blake, Paul A. Northcott, Marc Remke, Hendrik Witt, Olaf Witt, Wolfram Scheurlen, Marcel Kool, Michael D. Taylor, Benedikt Brors, Christof von Kalle, Roland Eils, Andrey Korshunov, Scott L. Pomeroy, Jan O. Korbel, Stefan M. Pfister, Peter Lichter

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedulloblastomaBiologyCopy-number variationGeneticsExome sequencingGeneIndelATRXTranscriptomeCancerDNA sequencingExomeGenomeSomatic evolution in cancerSomatic cellWnt signaling pathwayMutationGenotypeSingle-nucleotide polymorphism

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: The International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) is a worldwide network aiming to provide comprehensive molecular genetic profiles of 50 clinically and societally important tumors. A major focus of the ICGC PedBrain Tumor project is medulloblastoma (MB) - the most common malignant brain tumor in childhood. Importantly, recent work has shown that MB is not a single disease, but is in fact comprised of 4 distinct molecular subgroups (WNT, SHH, Group 3, Group 4). Using an integrative next-generation sequencing-based approach, we have investigated tumorigenic events underlying medulloblastoma, with the aim of identifying novel diagnostic or prognostic markers, and therapeutic targets. Methods: The whole genome of 50 tumor-normal DNA pairs, plus the whole exome or 2,500 target genes in a further 100 sample pairs from different histological and transcriptomic subgroups, was sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq platform. Sequencing-based high-resolution copy-number data was also generated for all cases. Results: Overall, a smaller number of non-synonymous somatic mutations was seen than in most adult malignancies. The number of somatic changes also clearly showed a positive correlation with patient age, suggesting either longer-term selection for more weakly transforming alterations, or the acquisition of additional passenger mutations in tumors which grew over a longer period. Whilst some point mutations and small InDels affected known MB or cancer-related genes (e.g. CTNNB1, PTCH1, MLL2), the vast majority were in genes which have not previously been implicated in medulloblastoma. Furthermore, even the most recurrently altered genes were mutated in <20% of samples overall, although several showed a clear enrichment in distinct subgroups. Pathway analysis revealed chromatin modification as one of the most frequently altered cellular processes, with hits in multiple pathway members. Novel copy-number alterations were also identified. For example, a pattern of catastrophic chromosome shattering (‘chromothripsis’) was observed almost exclusively in the SHH tumor subgroup. Conclusion: Next-generation sequencing of this large tumor cohort has provided a number of new insights into this deadly pediatric tumor. The overriding pattern is one of enormous heterogeneity, but integration with molecular subgrouping shows clear enrichment of certain alterations. This first stage of the ICGC PedBrain project has demonstrated the power of next-gen sequencing approaches to reveal significant new insights, providing a number of novel targets for potential therapeutic intervention. It also, however, indicates the importance of personalised approaches to treatment optimisation, and shows the scale of the coming challenge in terms of functionally validating the huge number of novel mutations. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4872. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-4872

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→