MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2312408220 · doi:10.1021/cg500905z

Copper(I) Halides (X = Br, I) Coordinated to Bis(arylthio)methane Ligands: Aryl Substitution and Halide Effects on the Dimensionality, Cluster Size, and Luminescence Properties of the Coordination Polymers

2014· article· en· W2312408220 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueCrystal Growth & Design · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique
KeywordsIsostructuralChemistryMonoclinic crystal systemCrystallographyCoordination polymerLigand (biochemistry)Steric effectsMethaneRibbonMetal-organic frameworkHalideArylStereochemistryCrystal structureInorganic chemistryOrganic chemistryMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bis(phenylthio)methane ( L1 ) reacts with CuI to yield the 1D-coordination polymer [{Cu 4 (μ 3 -I) 4 }(μ- L1 ) 2 ] n ( 1 ) bearing cubane Cu 4 I 4 clusters as connecting nodes. The crystal structures at 115, 155, 195, and 235 K provided evidence for a phase transition changing from the monoclinic space group C 2/ c to P 2 1 / c . The self-assembly process of CuI with bis( p -tolylthio)methane ( L2 ), bis(4-methoxyphenylthio)methane ( L3 ), and bis(4-bromo-phenylthio)methane ( L4 ) affords the 1D-coordination polymers [{Cu 4 (μ 3 -I) 4 }(μ- L x ) 2 ] n ( x = 2, 3, or 4). Compounds 2 and 4 are isostructural with C 2/ c low temperature polymorph of 1, whereas the inversion centers and 2-fold axes are lost in 3 (space group Cc ). The use of bis( m -tolylthio)methane ( L5 ) has no impact on the composition and overall topology of the resulting 1D ribbon of [{Cu 4 (μ 3 -I) 4 }(μ- L5 ) 2 ] n ( 5 ). Even the coordination of the sterically crowded dithioether bis(5- tert -butyl-2-methylphenylthio)methane ( L8 ) does not alter the network topology generating the 1D polymer [{Cu 4 (μ 3 -I) 4 }(μ- L8 ) 2 ] n ( 8 ). The 1D polymer [{Cu(μ 2 -Br) 2 Cu}( L1 ) 2 ] ( 9 ) results from the coordination of L1 with CuBr in a 1:1 metal-to-ligand ratio. In contrast to the mean Cu···Cu distances, which are <2.8 Å noted for the Cu 4 (μ 3 -I) 4 clusters in the 1D polymers 1 – 8, the Cu···Cu contact within the Cu(μ 2 -Br) 2 Cu rhomboids of 9 [2.9194(8) Å] is above the sum of the van der Waals radii of two Cu atoms. The structural arrangement of 1D polymer [{Cu(μ 2 -Br) 2 Cu}( L3 ) 2 ] n ( 11 ) is quite similar to that of 9 . While the reaction of CuBr with L5 results in a similar 1D polymer [{Cu(μ 2 -Br) 2 Cu}( L5 ) 2 ] n ( 12 ), the reaction of CuBr with L2 leads to the dinuclear complex [{Cu(μ 2 -Br) 2 Cu}(η 1 - L2 ) 4 ] ( 10 ) ligated by four pendent bis( p -tolylthio)methane ligands. The ligation of bis( o -tolylthio)methane, L6, on CuBr also yields a discrete complex [{Cu(μ 2 -Br) 2 Cu}(MeCN) 2 (η 1 - L6 ) 2 ] ( 13 ) bearing MeCN and dangling dithioether ligands. A strong luminescence is detected for all CuI polymers, all exhibiting emission lifetimes in the microsecond time scale (i.e., phosphorescence). The polymers containing the Cu 4 I 4 core ( 1 – 8 ) exhibit the typically observed low-energy band and sometimes a weaker high-energy band. The nature of the low-energy band was proposed based on literature DFT and TDDFT computations and is predicted to be a mixture of cluster-centered (CC*) and metal/halide-to-ligand charger transfer (M/XLCT). An approximate relationship between the Cu···Cu distance and the emission maxima corroborates the CC* contribution to the nature of the excited states. The emission of the rhomboid-containing materials is assigned to M/XLCT based on literature works on similar motifs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.620

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it