Copper(I) Halides (X = Br, I) Coordinated to Bis(arylthio)methane Ligands: Aryl Substitution and Halide Effects on the Dimensionality, Cluster Size, and Luminescence Properties of the Coordination Polymers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bis(phenylthio)methane ( L1 ) reacts with CuI to yield the 1D-coordination polymer [{Cu 4 (μ 3 -I) 4 }(μ- L1 ) 2 ] n ( 1 ) bearing cubane Cu 4 I 4 clusters as connecting nodes. The crystal structures at 115, 155, 195, and 235 K provided evidence for a phase transition changing from the monoclinic space group C 2/ c to P 2 1 / c . The self-assembly process of CuI with bis( p -tolylthio)methane ( L2 ), bis(4-methoxyphenylthio)methane ( L3 ), and bis(4-bromo-phenylthio)methane ( L4 ) affords the 1D-coordination polymers [{Cu 4 (μ 3 -I) 4 }(μ- L x ) 2 ] n ( x = 2, 3, or 4). Compounds 2 and 4 are isostructural with C 2/ c low temperature polymorph of 1, whereas the inversion centers and 2-fold axes are lost in 3 (space group Cc ). The use of bis( m -tolylthio)methane ( L5 ) has no impact on the composition and overall topology of the resulting 1D ribbon of [{Cu 4 (μ 3 -I) 4 }(μ- L5 ) 2 ] n ( 5 ). Even the coordination of the sterically crowded dithioether bis(5- tert -butyl-2-methylphenylthio)methane ( L8 ) does not alter the network topology generating the 1D polymer [{Cu 4 (μ 3 -I) 4 }(μ- L8 ) 2 ] n ( 8 ). The 1D polymer [{Cu(μ 2 -Br) 2 Cu}( L1 ) 2 ] ( 9 ) results from the coordination of L1 with CuBr in a 1:1 metal-to-ligand ratio. In contrast to the mean Cu···Cu distances, which are <2.8 Å noted for the Cu 4 (μ 3 -I) 4 clusters in the 1D polymers 1 – 8, the Cu···Cu contact within the Cu(μ 2 -Br) 2 Cu rhomboids of 9 [2.9194(8) Å] is above the sum of the van der Waals radii of two Cu atoms. The structural arrangement of 1D polymer [{Cu(μ 2 -Br) 2 Cu}( L3 ) 2 ] n ( 11 ) is quite similar to that of 9 . While the reaction of CuBr with L5 results in a similar 1D polymer [{Cu(μ 2 -Br) 2 Cu}( L5 ) 2 ] n ( 12 ), the reaction of CuBr with L2 leads to the dinuclear complex [{Cu(μ 2 -Br) 2 Cu}(η 1 - L2 ) 4 ] ( 10 ) ligated by four pendent bis( p -tolylthio)methane ligands. The ligation of bis( o -tolylthio)methane, L6, on CuBr also yields a discrete complex [{Cu(μ 2 -Br) 2 Cu}(MeCN) 2 (η 1 - L6 ) 2 ] ( 13 ) bearing MeCN and dangling dithioether ligands. A strong luminescence is detected for all CuI polymers, all exhibiting emission lifetimes in the microsecond time scale (i.e., phosphorescence). The polymers containing the Cu 4 I 4 core ( 1 – 8 ) exhibit the typically observed low-energy band and sometimes a weaker high-energy band. The nature of the low-energy band was proposed based on literature DFT and TDDFT computations and is predicted to be a mixture of cluster-centered (CC*) and metal/halide-to-ligand charger transfer (M/XLCT). An approximate relationship between the Cu···Cu distance and the emission maxima corroborates the CC* contribution to the nature of the excited states. The emission of the rhomboid-containing materials is assigned to M/XLCT based on literature works on similar motifs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".