MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An evolving pattern of cardiovascular risk in 14,315 men and women attending a nurse-led, cardiac profiling and prevention clinic over a quarter of a century

2013· article· en· W2312600585 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
M. Carrington, Garry Jennings, Simon Stewart

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineProfiling (computer programming)Primary preventionDiseaseSecondary preventionQuarter (Canadian coin)GerontologyFamily medicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: The burden of cardiovascular disease continues to evolve as the demographic and risk factor profile of affected populations changes over time. In order to document potentially important changes in primary prevention efforts in this regard, we examined the risk profile of >14,000 first time attendees to a nurse-led, cardiac profiling and prevention clinic over a 25-year period. Methods: Routine demographic and clinical data were collected, in a standardised manner, in 7815 men and 6500 women who visited the free and open public access clinic (located in a cardiology unit of a major tertiary hospital) during the period June 1986 to December 2011. Data were compared on a sex-specific basis according to five-yearly historical periods (1986-1991 [P1 - initial 6 months included], 1992-1996 [P2], 1997-2001 [P3], 2002-2006 [P4], 2007-2011 [P5]). Results: Overall, the age profile of men (45.2±14.9 vs. 53.2±14.6 years) and women (45.8±15.5 vs. 52.4±14.3 years) attending the clinic was similar but progressively older over time (P1 vs. P5). In men, average blood pressure (BP) reached a peak during P3 (135±18/84±11 vs. 131±16/83±10 mmHg in P1) before declining in P4/P5 and in women peaked during P4 (137±21/80±11 vs. 126±19/79±11mmHg in P1); p<0.001 for all comparisions. Men and women with elevated BP (≥140/90mmHg) peaked in P2 (46.6%) and in P4 (45%), respectively, but declined overall (39.5% to 31.7% and 28.2% to 24% for P1 vs. P5, respectively); p<0.001. In women there were only small changes in average lipid levels, while in men there was an overall fall from P1 to P5 (5.4±1.1 vs. 5.0±1.2 mmol/L; p<0.001). Men and women with elevated lipid levels (total cholesterol ≥5.5mmol/L) generally declined over time (41.8% to 30.8% and 40.3% to 32.1% for P1 vs. P5, respectively); p<0.001. The proportion of current male smokers initially declined (from 14.3% to 11.2% in P3) before rising again (14.4% in P5) and in women progressively declined from 13.3% to 10.4% (P1 to P5; p<0.001). Throughout the study period (P1 to P5) both men (79.1±11.8 vs. 84.7±15.7 kg) and women (63.6±11.1 vs. 70.7±15.6 kg) became progressively heavier; p<0.001. Fasting blood glucose levels peaked in P3 for both men and women (∼0.5mmol/L more than P1) before also declining towards P1 levels in P4/P5. Conclusions: Over 25 years or more of clinical experience, men and women being profiled for the prevention of cardiovascular disease via a nurse-led clinic have become older and heavier. Consistent with population trends, historical highs in BP and lipid levels have now passed, but risk levels (particularly metabolic-related) remain high.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.507

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionFrench-language works237,207