MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2312680757 · doi:10.1136/jnis.2010.003251.57

E-057 Endovascular management of pediatric aneurysms

2010· article· en· W2312680757 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Essam Saleh, Benjamin Dawson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of NeuroInterventional Surgery · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAneurysmEndovascular treatmentMicrosurgerySurgeryRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Object Although the general principles of endovascular aneurysm treatment in adults hold true in children, these young patients pose unique challenges: small anatomy, longer life expectancy, associated conditions and unique morphological characteristics of the aneurysms. A few publications in literature have addressed the role of endovascular treatment for pediatric aneurysms. These include series by Agid et al (2005) revisiting the Toronto series (Laughlin et al 1997), Lasjaunias et al (2005) updating the Bicêtre series (Lasjaunias et al 1997) and Nader et al presenting the San Francisco series (2006). In their conclusions, the authors of the former two publications favored endovascular treatment over microsurgery. On the other hand, the authors of the later publication favored microsurgery over endovascular treatment. The authors reviewed Louisiana State University experience regarding endovascular treatment of pediatric aneurysms focusing on outcomes. Methods A retrospective chart review of children under 18 years of age who underwent endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms between 2000 and 2009 in our institution was undertaken. 12 patients harboring 17 aneurysms were identified. The patients ranged in age from 17 months to 17 years. Complete aneurysm obliteration following endovascular treatment was 90%. Our results showed unique features for pediatric aneurysms compared with adult aneurysms. There was no intraoperative mortality. One aneurysm recurred (5% recurrence rate among total number of aneurysms). Six months after treatment, a control angiogram showed that the coils displaced towards the dome of the recurred aneurysm. This recurrence occurred before the introduction of the hydro coils. One patient died during the postintervention period (8% recurrence rate among total number of patients). Outcomes were better in anterior circulation aneurysms than in posterior circulation lesions. We had no mortality, morbidity or disability in the anterior circulation aneurysm group. In the posterior circulation group, there was one death representing 14% of the nine patients with aneurysms in this group. One recurrence occurred in the posterior circulation group representing 11% of the nine aneurysms in this group. The follow-up of all patients ranged from 2 to 8 years. Conclusion Endovascular treatment of pediatric intracranial aneurysm is safe and efficacious. The endovascular treatment in many instances provides less morbidity and mortality for treatment of pediatric aneurysms in inaccessible or eloquent locations than microsurgical clipping. The result of endovascular treatment depends on the location of the aneurysms and the underlying pathology. We advocate a multidisciplinary approach when choosing the therapeutic modality for treatment of pediatric aneurysms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.230
Threshold uncertainty score0.668

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeuroInterventional SurgerySame topicIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207