MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2312696187 · doi:10.1021/ie3007424

Esterification of Acetic Acid with <i>n</i>-Hexanol in Batch and Continuous Chromatographic Reactors Using a Gelular Ion-Exchange Resin as a Catalyst

2012· article· en· W2312696187 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Dipesh Patel, Basudeb Saha

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Chromatography
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBeef Cattle Research Council
KeywordsAcetic acidChemistryIon-exchange resinChromatographyCatalysisBatch reactorHexanolOrganic chemistryAlcohol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Heterogeneously catalyzed esterification reactions of acetic acid and n -hexanol were studied in batch and continuous chromatographic reactors in the presence of a gelular ion-exchange resin catalyst (Purolite CT-124) to synthesize a value added ester, namely n -hexyl acetate. A laboratory scale batch chromatographic reactor column (BCRC) was designed and constructed. BCRC experiments were carried out using different parameters such as feed flow rate, feed mole ratio (FMR) of n -hexanol to acetic acid, desorbent ( n -hexanol) flow rate, and reaction step time to maximize the formation of n -hexyl acetate as well as to achieve complete conversion of acetic acid. Samples were collected from the chromatographic reactor column (CRC) outlet at regular intervals and were analyzed by gas chromatography (GC). The continuous chromatographic reactor column (CCRC) was designed, constructed, and commissioned on the basis of the results obtained from the BCRC experiments. The experiments carried out in a CCRC correlate very well with the results obtained from the optimized reaction condition in a BCRC for maximum formation of n -hexyl acetate and complete conversion of acetic acid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicAnalytical Chemistry and ChromatographyFrench-language works237,207