Gas-Phase Solvation of Protonated Amino Acids by Methanol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The enthalpy and entropy changes for the formation of the 1:1 complexes of methanol with various gaseous protonated amino acids have been measured using pulsed-ionization high-pressure mass spectrometry. The enthalpy changes for formation of the clusters Gly(MeOH)H(+), Ala(MeOH)H(+), Val(MeOH)H(+), Leu(MeOH)H(+), Ile(MeOH)H(+), and Pro(MeOH)H(+) have been determined to be -92.0, -83.3, -82.4, -79.5, -78.7, and -73.6 kJ mol(-1), respectively. These values agree very well with the energetic values computed at the MP2(full)/6-311++G(2d,2p)//B3LYP/6-311+G(d,p) level of theory for the lowest energy adducts in each system. Both experimental observations and computational determinations of the potential energy surface for the glycine system suggest that a mixture of low-lying isomers may be present for each of the cluster systems examined. The primary structural motif for these clusters is the coordination of the methanol molecule to the ammonium group of the protonated amino acid via a strong ionic hydrogen bond. For the amino acids studied here, computational results reveal that one methanol molecule does not sufficiently stabilize any zwitterionic structure such that no appreciable extent of proton transfer from the amino acid to methanol was observed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".