A morphological and molecular study in the <i>Deschampsia cespitosa</i> complex (Poaceae; Poeae; Airinae) in northern North America
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PREMISE OF THE STUDY: In the North American Arctic, the existence of one or several taxa closely related to Deschampsia cespitosa var. cespitosa has remained a puzzle for many years. Extreme morphological variation, lack of clear limits between alleged forms, and an extended geographic range often render identification keys incomplete, and raise the question of how many species this taxon represents. METHODS: Morphological and molecular analysis, including multivariate statistics, ITS and the cpDNA marker trnK-rps16, was conducted on D. cespitosa var. cespitosa and related taxa using 201 herbarium specimens from northern North America (Alaska, Canada, and Greenland). Fifty-three morphological centeracters were recorded from all specimens, while sequences were retrieved from 167 specimens. KEY RESULTS: Results show that Deschampsia cespitosa (L.) P. Beauv. var. cespitosa, D. cespitosa subsp. alpina (L.) Tzvelev, D. cespitosa subsp. beringensis (Hultén) W. E. Lawr., D. brevifolia R. Br., D. cespitosa (L.) P. Beauv. subsp. glauca (Hartm.) C. Hartm., D. mackenzieana Raup, D. cespitosa subsp. orientalis Hultén, and D. pumila (Griseb.) Ostenf. differed significantly in a few morphological variables, but molecularly are a closely related group with several sequences and haplotypes that are nearly identical. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the evidence points to the existence of a single species, Deschampsia cespitosa. The occurrence of slightly different morphological types related to specific geographical distributions allows recognition of three additional taxa at the infraspecific level, D. cespitosa subsp. alpina, D. cespitosa subsp. beringensis, and D. brevifolia. All studied taxa showed morphological variation in a gradient, suggesting the existence of phenotypic plasticity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".