MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

O2-S5.03 Sex, drugs and structural interventions: unstable housing associated with increased HIV risk behaviour in a cohort of people on treatment in British Columbia, Canada

2011· article· en· W2312848224 on OpenAlexaffabout
Surita Parashar, Andrew Palmer, Nadia O’Brien, K. Chan, David J. Milan, Hasina Samji, Julio Montaner, Robert S. Hogg

Bibliographic record

VenueSexually Transmitted Infections · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityAIDS Vancouver
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDemographyPsychological interventionCohortCasualLogistic regressionCohort studySexual intercourseEnvironmental healthPopulationPsychiatryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Unstable living conditions may increase risk for HIV exposure and transmission. This analysis examines housing as a structural factor associated with drug and sexual risk behaviours among individuals accessing antiretroviral treatment (ART). We hypothesised that unstable housing is significantly associated with sex exchange and recent injection drug use (IDU). Methods The LISA cohort is a cross-sectional study of individuals on ART in British Columbia. Interviewer-administered surveys collect information regarding housing, drug use, utilisation of health services and other clinically relevant socio-demographic factors. Clinical variables, such as CD4 count and viral load, were obtained through longitudinal linkages with the Drug Treatment Program (DTP) at the BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS. In order to examine the effect of housing status on HIV risk behaviour, multivariate logistic regression was used with three outcomes: sex exchange, unprotected intercourse and recent IDU. Results Between 2007 and 2010 approximately 1000 participants were interviewed. The survey was modified part way through the study to stratify sexual behaviour based on partner-type. This analysis is thus restricted to 477 interviews with full information on all outcomes. Median age was 45 (IQR=39–51) and 29.8% (142) were female. After adjusting for potential confounders, unstable housing was significantly associated with a history of exchanging sex for food, money or drugs (Adjusted OR [AOR]=1.92; 95% CI=1.11% to 3.33%) and recent IDU (AOR=2.39; 95% CI=1.41% to 4.03%). Unprotected sexual intercourse with regular partners, casual contacts and clients, was not significantly associated with housing status. Conclusion Greater levels of sexual exchange and injection drug use among unstably housed populations are associated with aspects of transient living conditions, as well as the increased need and opportunity for sexual exchanges for food, shelter, drugs and money. Our findings suggest that secure and affordable housing is an important structural intervention that may reduce HIV risk behaviour.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSexually Transmitted InfectionsSame topicHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskFrench-language works237,207