Factors Affecting Phase I Stereoselective Biotransformation of Chiral Polychlorinated Biphenyls by Rat Cytochrome P-450 2B1 Isozyme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In vitro incubations of rat cytochrome P-450 (CYP) 2B1 isozyme with three chiral polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) congeners (PCBs 45, 95, and 132) were performed to investigate factors affecting phase I stereoselective biotransformation. Rat CYP2B1 preferentially biotransformed the second-eluting atropisomers of PCBs 45 and 95 at low substrate concentration ranges (≤15 μM). Biotransformation competition by different congeners was also observed, with increasing competition at higher chlorination. Competition decreased the biotransformation rates of each congener stereoselectively, affecting atropisomeric composition. No atropisomeric enrichment was observed for PCB 132 upon incubation of the racemate. However, under the same conditions, significant differences in biotransformation kinetics were observed in individual atropisomer incubations, indicating that (+)-PCB 132 and (-)-PCB 132 were competitively biotransformed. Homology modeling and docking studies suggested that each atropisomer had different interactions with rat CYP2B1 and could dock with the isozyme at different locations. This is one possible explanation for stereoselective biotransformation and competition of chiral PCBs at the molecular level. Our results suggest that the lack of predictive capability for stereoselectivity of PCBs and other chiral pollutants in biota may be due to competitive and/or inhibitory activities of different substrates, including individual enantiomers of the same compound.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".