MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract P5-15-02: Characteristics and Prognosis of Patients Presenting with Isolated Axillary Nodal Metastases from Occult Breast Primary Carcinoma

2010· article· en· W2313020383 on OpenAlexaff
JA Davidson, Scott Tyldesley, Caroline Speers, Ryan Woods, Stephen Chia

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBreast cancerAxillary lymph nodesCancerOncologyInternal medicineMastectomyCohortLymph nodePrimary tumorOccultRadiation therapyMetastatic breast cancerMetastasisPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Patients presenting with isolated axillary metastatic carcinoma represent a potentially curable subset of patients. As there are no published randomized trials, literature concerning this uncommon clinical entity is limited to small retrospective reports. These vary widely with respect to the information collected, span a large time period during which diagnostic and therapeutic options have advanced considerably, and are largely without a contemporary control group. Methods: The British Columbia Breast Cancer Outcomes Unit (BCOU) database was searched to identify patients referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency with a new diagnosis of isolated axillary metastatic cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2005. Eligible patients were female, had pathological evidence of lymph node (LN) involvement but no evidence of a primary tumor or distant metastases on clinical workup. A series of control patients, with pathological T1 tumors and N1 involvement at presentation were selected from the BCOU database matched 3:1 for age, diagnosis year, tumor characteristics (histology, estrogen receptor status, HER2 status, and number of affected lymph nodes), and systemic treatment characteristics (adjuvant chemotherapy and/or endocrine therapy). Results: 36 patients were identified to form the primary axillary cohort. The controls consisted of 1,406 patients, of whom 106 were matched for the above characteristics. Patients in the primary axillary cohort were fairly well-distributed among all diagnosis years, and all tumors exhibited ductal histology. 26 (72%) were estrogen receptor-positive and 8 (22%) were known to be HER2-positive. 9 (25%) patients underwent mastectomy. 33 (92%) patients received radiation therapy and 19 (53%) did not undergo any breast surgery. With a median follow-up of 5.2 and 5.4 years for the primary axillary cohort and the matched controls, the BCSS was 93% and 88% respectively. There were no locoregional recurrences documented in the primary axillary cohort. Conclusions: This study represents one of the larger contemporary case control series of isolated axillary nodal presentations, demonstrating a good prognosis for this cohort of patients despite approximately half of the patients not having primary breast surgery. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-15-02.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207