MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2313030590 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofu052.506

798Hospitalization due to Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) and Influenza Infection in Adult Patients: a Retrospective Cohort Study

2014· article· en· W2313030590 on OpenAlexaffabout
Cheryl Volling, Kazi Hassan, Ahmed Al-Den, John Ng, Lilian Law, Tony Mazzulli, Karen Green

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoMount Sinai Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRespiratory systemVirologyRetrospective cohort studyVirusCohortCohort studyImmunologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. A better understanding of the characteristics and outcomes of adult patients hospitalized with RSV as compared to influenza infection is needed. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients admitted to four hospitals in Toronto, Canada, between September 2012 and June 2013 with RSV or influenza infection diagnosed by RT-PCR. Main outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS), need for intensive care (ICU) or mechanical ventilation (MV), and all-cause mortality. Chi-square and Fisher's exact test were used for analysis. Results. 86 patients with RSV and 231 with influenza were included. Median age was 74y in RSV and 73y in influenza patients. Patients with RSV had more underlying illness (P = 0.03) with a trend toward greater underlying cardiac disease (P = 0.054), but no difference in rates of underlying lung disease, malignancy or immunosuppression. Most common symptoms and signs in both groups were cough, dyspnea, sputum production, fever, weakness and wheezing. 56% of influenza and 50% of RSV patients met CDC criteria, and 12% of influenza and 16% of RSV patients met PHAC criteria for influenza-like illness. Dyspnea, sputum production, weakness and wheezing were all more common in RSV patients (P = <0.01 for all). There were no significant differences in main outcomes, or overall lower respiratory tract or cardiovascular complications. CHF exacerbation was more common in RSV patients (P = 0.01). Mean and median hospital LOS was 11 and 6 days for both groups. 15% with RSV and 13% with influenza required ICU care, and 9% in both groups required MV. 6% with RSV and 9% with influenza died during hospitalization. Need for MV and ICU were associated with mortality in both groups (P = 0.01). More co-pathogens were identified in RSV patients (11/86 vs 14/231, p = 0.048), with greater associated mortality in influenza patients. 78% of RSV and 72% of influenza patients were treated with antibiotics. Conclusion. Adults hospitalized with RSV or influenza infection experience similar hospital LOS, need for ICU and MV, and mortality. While presenting signs and symptoms are nonspecific, patients with RSV have greater dyspnea, sputum production, weakness and wheezing. Patients with RSV and influenza often receive antibiotics. There is need for development of RSV vaccines and treatments for adults. Disclosures. All authors: No reported disclosures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicRespiratory viral infections researchFrench-language works237,207