MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2313144663 · doi:10.2298/jsc151029025c

The β-casein-resveratrol complex: Physicochemical characteristics and implications for enhanced nutrition

2016· article· en· W2313144663 on OpenAlexaff
Hao Cheng, Yanfang Li, Xundi Yin, Muriel Subirade, Li Liang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Serbian Chemical Society · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsChemistryResveratrolCaseinPolyphenolAntioxidantHydrophobic effectMoleculeFluorescenceBiochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Food proteins have been widely used as carrier materials for the encapsulation and protection of bioactive molecules. Clarification the mechanism of protein-bioactive molecule interaction is important for the development protein-based carrier systems. Interaction of b-casein with resveratrol, a natural polyphenol, was studied using ultraviolet-visible absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy. It was found that the interaction shifted the protein fluorophores to a more hydrophilic environment but the polyphenol to a more hydrophobic environment. Formation of the complex with b-casein did not affect trans-cis isomerization of resveratrol or the total antioxidant activity of the protein-polyphenol system, as analyzed respectively using spectrophotometry and 2,2-azinobis-3-ethyl-benzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid assay. The protective effect of resveratrol against the photodecomposition of folic acid was not affected by binding to b-casein. The data obtained should provide insight into protein-polyphenol interaction mechanisms and aid the development of b-casein-based carrier systems for the delivery of bioactive molecules.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.179

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Serbian Chemical SocietySame topicProtein Hydrolysis and Bioactive PeptidesFrench-language works237,207