MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2313165643 · doi:10.2307/3557751

China's Two-Korea Policy at Trial: The Hwang Chang Yop Crisis

2001· article· en· W2313165643 on OpenAlex
Chae-Jin Lee, Stephanie Hsieh

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePacific Affairs · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicKorean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

W A Then the People's Republic of China (China) threw its support strictly behind North Korea for almost four decades after the end of the Korean War (1950-1953), it gave generous amounts of military and economic assistance, was the major guarantor of Pyongyang's security, and rebuffed South Korean peace gestures. This extreme position could not long be maintained under the shifting conditions and demands of world politics and economics, however, especially as China sought to become increasingly integrated into the international community under Deng Xiaoping's guidance and to increase its leadership role in the Asian Pacific region. Attaining these goals has led to a new China policy on the Korean Peninsula, officially marked by the normalization of diplomatic relations between China and South Korea in 1992. It was also a step towards gradually edging out U.S. influence and establishing its own on the Korean Peninsula. While China has overhauled policies significantly toward South Korea, it has also attempted to maintain friendly relations with North Korea.1 By no means have the Chinese stopped providing assistance to North Korea or giving proper respect to the traditional close relationship between the two countries. At the same time, China has been cooperative in urging negotiations for a new and permanent Korean peace treaty and in participating in the Four-Party talks. The PRC, along with the U.S.,Japan and Russia, has a goal to promote stability on the potentially explosive Korean Peninsula, but does not want the status quo change radically, since its relationships with both Koreas are advantageous for China. Thus, its two-Korea policy, practical and updated, signals China's new determination to assume a position of leadership in the world, especially in Asia. Managing to maintain good relations with both Koreas is a balancing act in which China must carefully adapt to changes and events on the peninsula. The defection of high-profile North Korean leader Hwang Chang Yop while he was in Beijing in February 1997 created a tense diplomatic situation

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.954
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it