China's Two-Korea Policy at Trial: The Hwang Chang Yop Crisis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
W A Then the People's Republic of China (China) threw its support strictly behind North Korea for almost four decades after the end of the Korean War (1950-1953), it gave generous amounts of military and economic assistance, was the major guarantor of Pyongyang's security, and rebuffed South Korean peace gestures. This extreme position could not long be maintained under the shifting conditions and demands of world politics and economics, however, especially as China sought to become increasingly integrated into the international community under Deng Xiaoping's guidance and to increase its leadership role in the Asian Pacific region. Attaining these goals has led to a new China policy on the Korean Peninsula, officially marked by the normalization of diplomatic relations between China and South Korea in 1992. It was also a step towards gradually edging out U.S. influence and establishing its own on the Korean Peninsula. While China has overhauled policies significantly toward South Korea, it has also attempted to maintain friendly relations with North Korea.1 By no means have the Chinese stopped providing assistance to North Korea or giving proper respect to the traditional close relationship between the two countries. At the same time, China has been cooperative in urging negotiations for a new and permanent Korean peace treaty and in participating in the Four-Party talks. The PRC, along with the U.S.,Japan and Russia, has a goal to promote stability on the potentially explosive Korean Peninsula, but does not want the status quo change radically, since its relationships with both Koreas are advantageous for China. Thus, its two-Korea policy, practical and updated, signals China's new determination to assume a position of leadership in the world, especially in Asia. Managing to maintain good relations with both Koreas is a balancing act in which China must carefully adapt to changes and events on the peninsula. The defection of high-profile North Korean leader Hwang Chang Yop while he was in Beijing in February 1997 created a tense diplomatic situation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".