Survey of Pacific Egg and Poultry Association Scholarship Recipients (1965-1994)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Scholarship and Research Foundation of the Pacific Egg and Poultry Association, a West Coast trade association, began awarding scholarships in 1965. The scholarship program was established as a means of rewarding high scholastic performance and encouraging careers in the poultry industries. A survey was conducted of the 1965 to 1994 recipients. During the 30-yr period, the association awarded 513 scholarships. Alumni association offices in western Canada and the United States were able to provide current mailing addresses for 312 of the recipients. A letter was sent to each former recipient requesting information on postdegree career paths. Responses were received from 104 or 33.3% of the individuals. Initial career choices and current occupations were tabulated. Broad occupational choices were categorized as poultry, agriculturally related nonpoultry, nonagricultural, still in school, or unknown. Poultry-related careers were categorized by more specific job definitions: live production, allied industry, extension, research/teaching faculty, and veterinary medicine. The poultry industries attracted 52.9% of the recipients for their first postdegree job. Currently, 50.0% of the recipients are employed by the poultry industries. Of those, 36.5% are in live production, 19.2% in allied industry, 5.8% in extension, 17.3% in research/teaching, and 21.1% in veterinary medicine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".