Atovaquone suspension for treatment of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in HIV-infected patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe clinical experience with atovaquone suspension for the treatment of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) in HIV-infected patients. DESIGN: A retrospective chart review. METHODS: The medical records of 54 HIV-infected patients with PCP treated with atovaquone were examined. The outcomes of 34 patients treated with atovaquone suspension (750 mg twice a day) were compared with those of 20 patients treated with atovaquone tablets (750 mg three times a day). RESULTS: The proportion of patients successfully treated was similar with the suspension (74%) and tablet (70%) formulations of atovaquone. The proportion of patients with an inadequate response to therapy was lower for patients treated with atovaquone suspension (15%) than tablets (30%). Both formulations were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Atovaquone suspension is effective and well tolerated for the treatment of PCP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".