Significant Enhancement of Energy Barriers in Dinuclear Dysprosium Single-Molecule Magnets Through Electron-Withdrawing Effects
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of electron-withdrawing ligands on the energy barriers of Single-Molecule Magnets (SMMs) is investigated. By introducing highly electron-withdrawing atoms on targeted ligands, the energy barrier was significantly enhanced. The structural and magnetic properties of five novel SMMs based on a dinuclear {Dy2} phenoxo-bridged motif are explored and compared with a previously studied {Dy2} SMM (1). All complexes share the formula [Dy2(valdien)2(L)2]·solvent, where H2valdien = N1,N3-bis(3-methoxysalicylidene) diethylenetriamine, the terminal ligand L = NO3(-) (1), CH3COO(-) (2), ClCH2COO(-) (3), Cl2CHCOO(-) (4), CH3COCHCOCH3(-) (5), CF3COCHCOCF3(-) (6), and solvent = 0.5 MeOH (4), 2 CH2Cl2 (5). Systematic increase of the barrier was observed for all complexes with the most drastic increase seen in 6 when the acac ligand of 5 was fluorinated resulting in a 7-fold enhancement of the anisotropic barrier. Ab initio calculations reveal more axial g tensors as well as higher energy first excited Kramers doublets in 4 and 6 leading to higher energy barriers for those complexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it