MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Monitoring calcium‐deficient calmodulin in mouse embryonic stem cells before and after cellular differentiation

2009· article· en· W2313315978 on OpenAlexafffund
Odisho Israel, Eric Jervis, J. Guy Guillemette

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCell biologyCytoplasmEmbryonic stem cellCalmodulinCalciumCalcium-binding proteinCellChemistryConfocalNucleusCalcium signalingConfocal microscopyEndogenyCellular differentiationGreen fluorescent proteinBiologySignal transductionBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Calmodulin (CaM) is a calcium‐sensing protein that binds and regulates over 300 cellular proteins. Cellular localization and trafficking of calcium‐free CaM prior and after Ca 2+ stimulation is not well understood. It has been reported that 95% of total endogenous CaM is bound to target proteins in the cytoplasm, and that the influx of Ca 2+ results in its translocation to the nucleus. The present study was designed to investigate the Ca 2+ ‐ dependent and Ca 2+ ‐independent protein trafficking of CaM during cellular differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cell (MESC). Several CaM mutants were generated and labeled with a fluorescent marker for our investigation. In addition, a FITC labeled cell penetrating peptide (CPP) was used as a tool to introduce these CaM mutants into the cytoplasm of MESCs while maintaining high cell viability. The effects of these modifications on protein trafficking in MESCs during cellular differentiation are monitored via live fluorescent imaging and confocal microscopy. This research is supported by NSERC (J.G.G)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB Journal→Same topicAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques→French-language works237,207→