A comparative clarithromycin bioavailability study: determination of clarithromycin and 14-(R)-hydroxyclarithromycin under fasting and fed conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To report the first comprehensive analysis of clarithromycin (CLA) and 14-(R)-hydroxyclarithromcin (14R) bioequivalence metrics under both fasting and fed conditions when using a validated analytical method. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In separate, single dose bioequivalence studies, fasting (n = 40) and fed (n = 18) non-smoking subjects entered a 2-treatment, 2-period, 2-sequence, crossover trial to assess the comparative bioavailability of a 500 mg generic clarithromycin tablet (IVAX Pharmaceuticals, NJ, USA) relative to the reference product (Biaxin Filmtab, Abbott Laboratories, IL, USA). The validated assay employed an HPLC coupled to a triple stage quadrupole mass spectrometer. RESULTS: The analytics permitted plasma samples to be measured for both analytes with high precision and a lower limit ofquantitation (LLOQ) of 11 ng/ml. In both fasting and fed studies, and for both analytes, the IVAX product met the common mean geometric ratio and 90% confidence limits in order to be declared bioequivalent with Biaxin Filmtab. Furthermore, the intra-subject variabilities for the comparative AUC metrics in both studies and for both analytes were < or = 21% and < or = 26% for Cmax. CONCLUSIONS: The fasting and fed results present definitive evidence that 500 mg IVAX clarithromycin and Biaxin Filmtab are bioequivalent under both fasting and fed conditions, whether based on CLA or 14R. Furthermore, at a 500 mg dose, clarithromycin is not a highly variable drug.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".