Preservation of Language in the Ataxic Infant in a Case of Cerebellar Agenesis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An eight-month-old male Caucasian infant presented with ataxia and titubations, which had been noticed shortly after birth. He was born to healthy non-consanguineous parents after an unremarkable pregnancy. There was no maternal use of drugs, alcohol or tobacco. A prenatal ultrasound at 36 weeks conceptual age (performed at the request of the parents since the 20 week ultrasound had not been performed) revealed an enlarged posterior fossa, no cerebellar tissue, a normal corpus callosum and no evidence of hydrocephalus. He was delivered via spontaneous vaginal delivery at 37 weeks gestation without complications. Birth weight was 3630g and the neonatal course was unremarkable. Developmentally, at eight months-of-age he could not sit. A formal developmental assessment at 19 months-of-age revealed gross and fine motor delay. He was pulling to stand and was cruising but was not walking independently. He was able to stack two cubes. He was very social, highly imitative and used over 50 words. His words were clear and there was no dysarthria. His receptive and expressive language skills were deemed to be at the 18-21 month level. Family history was non-contributory. Physical examination at 19 months-of-age revealed weight and height between the 10-25 percentiles and head circumference at the 25th percentile. Head titubation was present throughout the examination. Extraocular movements were full, with bilateral intermittent esotropia. Upon fixing of the head, horizontal nystagmus and saccadic intrusions on smooth pursuit exam were noted. Fundoscopic examination was normal. He had mild truncal hypotonia, with appropriate strength for his age.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".