MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2313775293 · doi:10.2118/176410-ms

An Empirical Correlation to Predict the SAGD Recovery Performance

2015· article· en· W2313775293 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaohu Dong, Huiqing Liu, Jirui Hou, Zhangxin Chen, Tianlin Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Science and Technology Major ProjectNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringSteam-assisted gravity drainageProcess (computing)Submarine pipelinePerformance predictionEnhanced oil recoveryComputer scienceEngineeringOil sandsGeotechnical engineeringSimulationMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The prediction of the recovery performance for Steam-Assisted-Gravity-Drainage (SAGD) process is becoming increasingly important as the SAGD projects all over the world continue to increase. The prediction of SAGD recovery performance should go back to the theory basis developed by Butler (1978). Afterwards, based on his model, many modified models are proposed. But most of these models are analytical or semi-analytical methods, and the predicting process is much complicated. In particular for the SAGD projects in some irregular thick heavy oil reservoir, it will be a hard work. Thus, a quick and easy method is needed to screen the heavy oil reservoirs for potential SAGD project. In this study, based on the grey system theory, we developed a weighted grey correlation model firstly. Through this model, aiming at a typical thick heavy oil reservoir from Bohai offshore oilfield, China, the influences of reservoir/fluid parameters and operation parameters on SAGD recovery performance were comprehensively evaluated. And a sensitive sequence of each parameter was derived to reflect the sensitive degree. Thus a static multi-parameter nonlinear correlation is proposed to predict the oil recovery, recovery rate and cumulative oil-steam ratio (COSR) of SAGD process. Then, this correlation is used to predict the SAGD recovery performance in some potential thick heavy oil reservoirs of Bohai oilfield and the results is compared against the numerical simulation model. During this process, we also make a survey on the successful SAGD projects around the world and analyze the development features. Through the modification to the proposed correlation above, it is validated. From the simulation results, it is indicated that the SAGD recovery performance is more sensitive to the parameters of reservoir thickness, permeability (including horizontal and vertical), net-to-gross value and steam chamber pressure. Based on the gray related degrees and the sensitivity results, we proposed a six parameters nonlinear correlation to predict the recovery indicators of SAGD process. Thus, using this correlations, the recovery performance of several SAGD projects are predicted, and the correlation results are in good agreement with those obtained from numerical simulation. The prediction error of recovery factor and COSR is controlled within 10%. Furthermore, from the validation results, we found after a modification process, our correlation could be used. Our correlation is a static method to predict the recovery performance of SAGD process in heavy oil reservoir, and it could be used to successfully predict the recovery performance of SAGD projects in heavy oil reservoirs. Through the utilization of this correlation, the SAGD recovery performance in candidate oil reservoirs could be rapidly obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207