MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

CONGESTION MANAGEMENT AND LOOP FLOW CONTROL BY TRANSMISSION NETWORK RECONFIGURATION

2010· article· en· W2313808707 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
G.P. Granelli, P. Marannino, M. Montagna, M. Innorta

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Power and Energy Systems · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl reconfigurationComputer scienceTransmission networkMathematical optimizationInteger programmingFlow networkTransmission (telecommunications)Electrical networkCongestion managementPower flowNetwork congestionElectric power systemDistributed computingPower (physics)EngineeringComputer networkMathematicsTelecommunicationsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper the problem of finding the optimal topological reconfiguration of a power transmission system is considered with the aim of providing a tool suited for congestion management. Network reconfiguration looks particularly appealing since it allows the relief of overloads by means of switching operations that may avoid generation or load curtailments. The techniques of corrective switching are profitably employed to formulate the problem of network reconfiguration for the purpose of congestion management. It is shown in the paper that the same optimization model employed in corrective switching can be used to solve the loop (or parallel) flow problem which occurs in today large interconnected systems. The solution of the resulting large-scale mixed-integer programming problem is carried out by a deterministic branch-and-bound algorithm included in the CPLEX optimization package. Tests were performed on the Italian network and on the European (UCTE) system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Power and Energy SystemsSame topicInterconnection Networks and SystemsFrench-language works237,207