Effect of Flaw Orientation on Delayed Hydride Crack Initiation in Zr-2.5Nb Pressure Tubes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Zr-2.5Nb pressure tubes of CANDU reactor are susceptible to a cracking mechanism known as Delayed Hydride Cracking (DHC), which is a repetitive process that involves hydrogen diffusion, hydride precipitation and fracture at a stress concentrator such as a flaw or a crack. Service-induced flaws are present in some pressure tubes and they need to be assessed for susceptibility to DHC initiation. An engineering procedure based on the process-zone methodology has been developed and incorporated into the Canadian standard to determine the susceptibility of flaws in pressure tubes to DHC initiation. The engineering procedure was validated against experiments on flaws which were oriented in the axial direction of the pressure tube. However, many of the service-induced flaws are oriented at some oblique angle with respect to the axial direction of the tube and they may have higher threshold stresses for DHC initiation than those of the axial flaws. It would be advantageous to apply the process-zone evaluation procedure to such angled blunt flaws. For this purpose, an experimental study was carried out to measure the threshold stresses for DHC initiation from machined V-notches with different orientations (0°, 15°, 30° and 45°) with respect to the axial direction of an unirradiated pressure tube. The experimental results were used to support the development of the evaluation procedure for angled blunt flaws. The experimental program and the validation of the engineering procedure for angled blunt flaws are described in this paper.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".