Tumor-Infiltrating Immune Cells Are Associated With Prognosis of Gastric Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Immune cells contribute to determining the prognosis of gastric cancer. However, their exact role is less clear. We determined the prognostic significance of different immune cells in intratumoral tissue (T), stromal tissue (S), and adjacent normal tissue (N) of 166 gastric cancer cases and their interactions, including CD3+, CD4+, CD8, CD57+, CD68+, CD66b+, and Foxp3+ cells, and established an effective prognostic nomogram based on the immune reactions. We found high densities of TCD3+, TCD4+, TCD8+, SCD3+, SCD4+, SCD57+, SCD66b+, and NFoxp3+ cells, as well as high TCD8+/SCD8+ ratio, TCD68+/SCD68+ ratio, TCD3+/TFoxp3+ ratio, TCD4+/TFoxp3+ ratio, TCD8+/TFoxp3+ ratio, SCD3+/SFoxp3+ ratio, and SCD4+/SCD8+ ratio were associated with better survival, whereas high densities of TCD66b+, TFoxp3+, SFoxp3+ and NCD66b+ cells as well as high TCD57+/SCD57+ ratio, TCD66b+/SCD66b+ ratio, SCD8+/SFoxp3+ ratio, and TFoxp3+/NFoxp3+ ratio were associated with significantly worse outcome. Multivariate analysis indicated that tumor size, longitudinal tumor location, N stage, TCD68+/SCD68+ ratio, TCD8+/TFoxp3+ ratio, density of TFoxp3+ cells, and TCD66b+/SCD66b+ ratio were independent prognostic factors, which were all selected into the nomogram. The calibration curve for likelihood of survival demonstrated favorable consistency between predictive value of the nomogram and actual observation. The C-index (0.83, 95% CI: 0.78 to 0.87) of our nomogram for predicting prognosis was significantly higher than that of TNM staging system (0.70). Collectively, high TCD68+/SCD68+ ratio and TCD8+/TFoxp3+ ratio were associated with improved overall survival, whereas high density of TFoxp3+ cells and TCD66b+/SCD66b+ ratio demonstrated poor overall survival, which are promising independent predictors for overall survival in gastric cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".