MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2313960894 · doi:10.1021/ef300904a

Possible Role of Asphaltenes in the Stabilization of Water-in-Crude Oil Emulsions

2012· article· en· W2313960894 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources CanadaUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsphalteneEmulsionChemical engineeringPulmonary surfactantSteric effectsAmphiphileRheologyOil dropletMaterials scienceCrude oilChemistryOrganic chemistryChromatographyPetroleum engineeringComposite materialCopolymerGeologyPolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Asphaltene hierarchical aggregation contributes to water-in-oil (W/O) emulsion stability by forming a network structure within thin oil film, separating approaching water droplets. This structure changes the rheology of the film-forming oil to non-Newtonian, which prevents the film drainage at thickness less than about 50–100 nm. It also provides a steric stabilization mechanism to the system. Asphaltenes do not have well-defined hydrophilic heads and hydrophobic tails and, thus, do not have amphiphilic character. Therefore, they are not similar to surfactants and cannot stabilize emulsions the way classic emulsifiers do. The proposed stabilization mechanisms do not invoke any surfactant-like behavior of asphaltenes. Instead, they solely rely on asphaltene aggregation propensity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.217

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it