MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2313994511 · doi:10.1021/jp1035597

Kinetics and Mechanism of<i>S</i>-Nitrosothiol Acid-Catalyzed Hydrolysis: Sulfur Activation Promotes Facile NO<sup>+</sup>Release

2011· article· en· W2313994511 on OpenAlexafffund
Ernesto E Moran, Qadir K. Timerghazin, Elizabeth Kwong

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
Canadian institutionsMerck Canada Inc. (Canada)Concordia University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsChemistryProtonationNitrosoHydrolysisNucleophileMedicinal chemistrySulfurCatalysisStereochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The denitrosation of three primary S-nitrosothiols (RSNO; S-nitrosocysteine, S-nitroso-N-acetylcysteine, and S-nitrosoglutathione) and two tertiary RSNOs (S-nitrosopenicillamine and S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine) was investigated in 3.75 M H(2)SO(4) to probe the mechanism of acid-catalyzed RSNO hydrolysis and its dependence on RSNO structure. This reversible reaction was forced to proceed in the denitrosation direction by trapping the nitrosating agent with HN(3). The primary RSNOs exhibited hydrolysis k(obs) values of ∼2 × 10(-4) s(-1), and the tertiary RSNO k(obs) values were an order of magnitude higher. Product analysis by HPLC revealed that the parent thiols (RSHs) were formed in 90-100% yield on 79-99% RSNO denitrosation. Possible hydrolysis mechanisms were studied computationally at the CBS-QB3 level using S-nitrosomethanethiol (MeSNO) as a model RSNO. Consideration of RSNOs as a combination of conventional R-S-N═O, zwitterionic R-S(+)═N-O(-), and RS(-)/NO(+) ion-pair resonance structures was key in understanding the mechanistic details of acid-catalyzed hydrolysis. Protonation of the S-nitroso oxygen or nitrogen activates the sulfur and nucleophilic attack by H(2)O at this atom leads to the formation of the sulfoxide-protonated N-hydroxysulfinamide, MeS(+)(OH)NHOH, with barriers of 19 and 29 kcal/mol, respectively. Proton loss and reprotonation at the nitrogen lead to secondary hydrolysis that produces the sulfinic acid MeS(═O)OH and NH(2)OH. Notably, no low-energy RSNO hydrolysis pathway for HNO release was found in the computational analysis. Protonation of the S-nitroso sulfur gives rise to NO(+) release with a low activation barrier (ΔH(double dagger)(calc) ≈ 6 kcal/mol) and the formation of MeSH in agreement with experiment. The experimental k(obs) can be expressed as K(a)k(1), where K(a) is the acid dissociation constant for protonation of the S-nitroso sulfur and k(1) the pseudo-first-order hydrolysis rate constant. Given the low ΔH(double dagger)(calc) for denitrosation of the S-protonated isomer, the observed slow rates of acid-catalyzed RSNO hydrolysis must be controlled by the magnitude of K(a). The 10-fold higher K(a) calculated for Me(3)CS(H(+))NO (∼10(-15)) compared to MeS(H(+))NO (10(-16)) is consistent with the order of magnitude larger k(obs) reported here for the tertiary vs primary RSNOs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry BSame topicNitric Oxide and Endothelin EffectsFrench-language works237,207