Rational Design for the Controlled Aggregation of Gold Nanorods <i>via</i> Phospholipid Encapsulation for Enhanced Raman Scattering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study describes a procedure that found a balance between the ability of polymer-stabilized nanorods (NRs) to self-assemble and the creation of narrow gaps to make reproducibly bright surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) nanorod dimers. NRs were end-functionalized with polymers, which enabled end-to-end self-assembly of NR chains and control over inter-rod separation through polymer molecular weight (MW). We found a way to quench the self-assembly, by phospholipid encapsulation, reducing the polydispersity of the aggregates while rendering them water-soluble. This reduction in polydispersity and preferential isolation of short-chain nanorod species is important for maximizing SERS enhancement from nanorod chains. We prepared NR aggregates that exhibit ∼5-50 times greater SERS intensity than isolated rods (and ∼750× greater than bare dye) depending on inter-rod separation, when using Oxazine 725 reporter molecules. Colloidal stability of NR aggregates and temporal stability of the SERS signal in water were observed for 110 days. With enhanced SERS intensity, water solubility, and stability, these NR aggregates are promising optical probes for future biological applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".