MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314113046 · doi:10.1097/pgp.0b013e31828cb0be

Primary Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Endometrium

2013· article· en· W2314113046 on OpenAlexaff
Nicole Bures, Gregg Nelson, Qiuli Duan, Anthony Magliocco, Doug Demetrick, Máire A. Duggan

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Gynecological Pathology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsFoothills Medical CentreUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Health Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPTENCyclin D1BiologyKRASImmunohistochemistryCancer researchCell cycleCarcinomaAdenocarcinomaPathologyCyclin-dependent kinase 6Internal medicineOncologyCancerMedicineMutationGenePI3K/AKT/mTOR pathwayApoptosisImmunologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Molecular alterations leading to cell cycle dysregulation in primary squamous cell carcinoma of the endometrium (PSCCE) and correlation with clinical outcome are incompletely described. Molecular variables of 5 cases of PSCCE were compared with 8 controls of endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma and correlated with overall survival. Immunohistochemical expression of pRB, p18, p19, CDK4, CDK6, Cyclin D1, p16, HPVE7, pTEN, ER, PR, and p53 was independently scored (intensity: 0-3 and proportion: 0-5) twice by 2 reviewers. Scores were averaged and expression was categorized as positive or negative. Human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA amplification and Braf and Kras mutations were assessed by polymerase chain reaction. Distribution differences between cases and controls were tested for significance using χ/Fisher exact tests. Differences in overall survival and correlation with variables were calculated using Kaplan-Meier and tested for significance using log rank tests. All cases and controls were mostly positive for pRB, p19, CDK6, and Cyclin D1 and mostly negative for p16, p18, CDK4, HPVE7, pTEN, and p53. Cases were mostly negative for ER and PR, whereas controls were mostly positive. All were negative for HPV DNA amplification and Braf mutations. One case and 2 controls had a Kras mutation. Only the ER and PR distribution difference was significant (P=0.03 and 0.02, respectively) and differences in overall survival did not correlate with any variable. PSCCE has molecular alterations involving the pRB-Cyclin D1-CDK4/6-p16 pathway, and pTEN. In contrast to the type I EACC, PSCCE is not hormonally sensitive, suggesting a unique pathogenesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Gynecological PathologySame topicEndometrial and Cervical Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207