MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314124273 · doi:10.1055/s-2006-949671

Skin-Derived Stem Cells: A Source of Schwann Cells that Survive and Ensheath Axons on Transplantation into Peripheral Nerve

2006· article· en· W2314124273 on OpenAlexaff
Rajiv Midha, Ian A. McKenzie, Jeff Biernaskie, Freda D. Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Reconstructive Microsurgery · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNerve injury and regeneration
Canadian institutionsCouncil of Ontario Universities
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeural crestSchwann cellNerve guidance conduitMedicineTransplantationAnatomyStem cellDermisProgenitor cellEpineurial repairNeuroscienceCell biologyPeripheral nervePathologyBiologyEmbryoSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clones of neural-crest-derived progenitor cells from skin dermis (termed SKPs for skin-derived precursors) can proliferate and differentiate under appropriate culture conditions to produce neurons, glia, and mesodermal cells. The authors hypothesized that SKPs introduced into a nerve will 1) survive and spread within the nerve; 2) differentiate into Schwann cells (SCs); and 3) ensheath regenerating axons from the proximal nerve stump. Donor SKPs were generated from embryonic transgenic mice (E17–18) expressing the enhanced green fluorescent protein (GFP). To encourage SC differentiation, SKPs were cultured for 1 week in DMEM:F12 media at a 3:1 ratio, supplemented with 1% N2, 10ng/ml heregulin and 4 umol forksolin. Immunosuppressed recipient adult male Sv129 mice underwent nerve surgery and inoculation with SKPs. The sciatic nerve was exposed in the proximal thigh and crushed for 1 min using #4 jewelers' forceps. An injection, 5 mm distal to the crush injury site, of 3 ul of SKP cells (∼150,000/ul) was made in the subepineurium using a 33-gauge Hamilton syringe. Controls consisted of normal mice and mice with crush injuries receiving a 3-ul injection of diluent. At 1–4 weeks following nerve injury (n = 5/time point), nerve samples were collected for immunohistochemistry. Confocal imaging and analysis of double-stained sections were done to assess the relationship between SKPs and axons. SKPs (GFP + cells) survived for up to 4 weeks and spread within the endoneurium for several millimeters in normal sciatic nerve. Both naïve and pre-differentiated SKPs co-expressed SC markers (MBP and PMP-22) in vivo and appeared to associate with axons within the sciatic nerve. Moreover, these SKPs, when injected into the nerve distal to the crush, expressed myelin proteins and became closely associated with regenerating (NF +) axons. In separate experiments, semithin section and immunogold EM analysis from Shiverer mice nerve receiving SKPs conclusively demonstrated that transplanted (MBP + and GFP +) cells myelinated Shiverer axons. SKPs survive, express SC markers, associate with axons, and indeed myelinate axons in regenerating peripheral nerves. Moreover, naïve SKPs can differentiate into SCs within the nerve, suggesting that axon-derived factors can drive this differentiation. These results suggest that skin may provide an accessible autologous source of Schwann cells for nerve transplantation and nerve repair.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Reconstructive MicrosurgerySame topicNerve injury and regenerationFrench-language works237,207