MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Ostomy-Stomal/Peristomal Complications

2009· article· en· W2314136925 on OpenAlexaff
Melissa Ayer

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders
Canadian institutionsShaughnessy Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIleostomySuctionJejunostomySurgeryStoma (medicine)EnterostomyParenteral nutritionAbdominal wallCrohn's diseaseDiseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: To present a case study involving the use of silver- impregnated hydrofiber and wall-suction in the treatment of peristomal pyoderma gangrenosum. RATIONALE: 60-year-old male suffering from Crohn's disease since his early teenage years. Had been in and out of the hospital for many years with complications from his disease, including multiple small and large bowel resections and revisions. Unfortunately, the patient has been left with short-bowel syndrome and a very high-output ileostomy, treated with Parenteral Nutrition in the past, but most recently was able to sustain nutrition. His Crohn's disease is complicated by very longstanding steroid dependency, in turn, developing Diabetes (poorly controlled) and pseudo obstruction, treated with decompressing proximal jejunostomy and home TPN. Patient developed extensive peristomal ulcers surrounding his jejunostomy with nausea, increased weakness and malnutrition, at which time patient agreed to be admitted to hospital for nutritional parenteral support. PROBLEM: Maintaining a pouching seal around the stoma that would heal the pyodermal ulcers and contain the effluent. MANAGEMENT: Utilized wound and ostomy products along with low wall suction to maintain a 7-day pouching seal and heal the pyoderma gangrenosum. Products utilized were a silver-impregnated hydrofiber, barrier spray, stomahesive powder, stomahesive wafer, convex 2 pc. pouching system, appliance belts, pink tape, and low wall suction. CONCLUSION: Pyodermal lesions healed, patient was able to maintain pouching system independently without the need for wall suction and patient was discharged back to home environment. Patient returned to hospital for unrelated diagnoses and follow-up was conducted. Patient's peristomal skin remained healed and ulcers did not return.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.838
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Wound Ostomy and Continence NursingSame topicAutoimmune and Inflammatory DisordersFrench-language works237,207