MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314169635 · doi:10.2514/6.2004-3400

Design Methodology for a Pulse Detonation Engine as a Ramjet Replacement

2004· article· en· W2314169635 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue40th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCombustion and Detonation Processes
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRamjetDetonationPulse (music)Aero engineAerospace engineeringComputer scienceAutomotive engineeringMechanical engineeringCombustorEngineeringCombustionExplosive materialTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An idealized pulse detonation engine (PDE) based on a realistic system concept is defined for which propulsive performance is significantly greater than that of a ramjet over a large range of Mach numbers. An analytical model of the system is developed that calculates physical, timing and flow parameters that can be used as input to multi -dimensional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analyses and provide a starting point for real system design. A parametric study of the influence on propulsive performance of flight Mach number, inlet pressure recovery, l ength of the detonation tube, mass flow rate of air through the engine, percentage purge and the tube filling strategy is performed with an analytical model and a one -dimensional code based on the method of characteristics. Finally, in a sample engine des ign exercise a PDE based system is specified for which propulsive performance for steady flight is significantly greater than that of a ramjet .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.815
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.088
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it