Processing of Eucalyptus viminalis leaves in Australian streams - importance of aquatic hyphomycetes and zoosporic fungi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The decomposition of 'Eucalyptus viminalis' leaves was examined over 8 weeks in 3 streams, each with two sites, in New South Wales, Australia. Invertebrate colonization of litter bags was negligible. Recovered leaves were aerated to induce sporulation by aquatic hyphomycetes. Conidial numbers generally started to increase after 28 days of stream exposure. Aerated leaves also released round structures tentatively identified as zoosporic propagules. Maxima were reached after 7 days of stream exposure. High levels of ergosterol were found in leaves after 7 days of stream exposure. Exponential decay rates varied between 0.0030 and 0.0065 (day⁻¹) and 0.00018 and 0.00054 (degree day⁻¹). Mass loss rates correlated significantly with maximum conidium release, but not with maximum ergosterol levels or maximum zoospore release, measured physicochemical stream parameters, or the presence of riparian vegetation. As reported from Europe and North-America, aquatic hyphomycetes appeared to play a major role in decomposition, but zoosporic fungi, generally ignored, may be involved in early stages of decay.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".