Public Participation in Scientific Research: a Framework for Deliberate Design
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Abstract
Shirk, J. L., H. L. Ballard, C. C. Wilderman, T. Phillips, A. Wiggins, R. Jordan, E. McCallie, M. Minarchek, B. V. Lewenstein, M. E. Krasny, and R. Bonney. 2012. Public participation in scientific research: a framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society 17(2): 29. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04705-170229
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- Ecology and Society
- Topic
- Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
- Field
- Business, Management and Accounting
- Canadian institutions
- —
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- Citizen sciencePublic participationPolitical scienceSociologyEcologyEnvironmental ethicsPublic administrationBiologyPhilosophy
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes