MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2314356037

Colorectal polyps in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's colitis.

2015· article· en· W2314356037 on OpenAlexaff
Fort Gasia M, Subrata Ghosh, Marietta Iacucci

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChromoendoscopyMedicineDysplasiaColonoscopyInflammatory bowel diseaseUlcerative colitisColorectal cancerEndoscopyInternal medicineGastroenterologyRadiologyDiseaseCancer
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIM: Patients with long-standing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have higher risk for developing dysplasia and colorectal cancer and consequently surveillance colonoscopy is required. The colonic lesion in these patients are often flat and subtle and may be difficult to detect by white light standard endoscopy. We aimed to review the potential of novel electronic optical enhancement techniques to enhance endoscopic diagnosis and therapeutic management of dysplasia in IBD and emerging strategies that may be useful. METHODS: We identified eligible and appropriate articles by electronic search of PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE between January 1980 and June 2015 using key words: dysplasia, colorectal cancer and IBD, surveillance in IBD, novel endoscopic techniques in IBD, therapeutic endoscopy in IBD, endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, pseudopolyps, dysplasia associated lesion or mass, adenoma associated lesion or mass, chromoendoscopy, autofluorescence, virtual chromoendoscopy, confocal endomicroscopy. RESULTS: Segmental random biopsies during white-light colonoscopy have been the recommended strategy for many years. Chromoendoscopy with colonic dye spray has been gradually implemented in recent years in order to highlight abnormalities in the mucosa and target biopsies. Simultaneously, a new generation of high-definition endoscopes with electronic filter technology that provide a detailed assessment of the mucosal and vascular colonic pattern havebeen developed and these have been adopted in clinical practise. Furthermore, the introduction of confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) offers the possibility to assess and characterize lesions in real-time histology and it can predict dysplastic changes with high accuracy. With the evolving novel techniques and fresh evidence, modification of the current surveillance guidelines were required. Therefore, the SCENIC consensus guidelines have been recently published and have defined the best endoscopic techniques to detect and characterize dysplasia and the clinical implications and management of dysplasia in IBD patients. CONCLUSION: Many uncertainties still remain whetherdye chromoendoscopy with targeted biopsies will be established as standard practice. However, optical enhancement endoscopic techniques are promising to perform surveillance colonoscopy with targeted biopsies for better assessment and management of the dysplastic lesions in IBD. Further studies are required to determine the best strategy for the diagnosis and treatment of dysplasia in IBD patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMed→Same topicInflammatory Bowel Disease→French-language works237,207→