MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314357654 · doi:10.1021/ef501397h

Vegetable Oil Deacidification by Methanol Heterogeneously Catalyzed Esterification in (Monophasic Liquid)/Solid Batch and Continuous Reactors

2014· article· en· W2314357654 on OpenAlexaff
Carlo Pirola, Federico Galli, Claudia L. Bianchi‬, Daria C. Boffito, A. Comazzi, Flavio Manenti

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiodiesel Production and Applications
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMethanolSunflower oilChemistryCatalysisBatch reactorBiodiesel productionBiodieselIon-exchange resinChemical engineeringOrganic chemistryChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The removal of free fatty acids (FFA) in vegetable oils is an important pretreatment in the production of biodiesel, in particular, when the starting materials are low-cost feedstocks. Heterogeneously catalyzed esterification with methanol transforms FFA in fatty acid methyl ester (FAME), decreasing the oil acidity and producing biodiesel simultaneously. The equilibrium of this reaction shifts toward the desired product when increasing the methanol content, but at the same time, a double-liquid-phase system forms when the methanol content is higher than 6–8 wt %. The presence of a double liquid phase can be an important drawback in the reactor. A detailed study about the optimization of the methanol quantity is presented, both using a batch and a packed-bed reactor (PBR) at different temperatures (between 60 and 105 °C) using Amberlyst 46 (ion-exchange resin) as the heterogeneous catalyst. The deacidification of sunflower oil in a monophasic liquid system leads to satisfactory results (final FFA lower than 0.5 wt %) for both of the reactors. The experimental results demonstrate that the excess of methanol is not convenient in terms of both slower reaction rates and mass of reactant used. The stability of Amberlyst 46 in the PBR was positively verified after 600 h of work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.768

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicBiodiesel Production and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207