Synergistic Effect of Inhibitors of MMPs and ROS-dependent Modifications of Contractile Proteins on Protection Hearts Subjected to Oxidative Stress
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cardiac ischemia, followed by reperfusion, often results in the development of cardiac contractile dysfunction that limits the recovery prognosis of patients. The current goal of pharmacological therapy in the course of ischemic heart disease is to improve the oxygen supply/demand ratio for the heart. Cardiac contractile proteins such as myosin light chain 1 and 2 (MLC1 and MLC2) and troponin I, play a significant role in the regulation of force development. It has been shown that MLC1 can be nitrated, S-nitrosylated, as well as phosphorylated. These posttranslational modifications (PTMs) of MLC1 are associated with an increase in the affinity for the proteolytic enzyme matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) resulting in an increased degradation of MLC1 that corresponds with the development of cardiac contractile dysfunction. The degree of MLC1 degradation is associated with the degree of mechanical dysfunction in the ischemic heart. Pharmacological regulation of the PTM status of cardiac contractile proteins can be achieved by inhibition of phosphorylation, nitration, or S-nitrosylation. Most pharmacological approaches for protecting the heart against ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury are based on the use of a single drug at full protective dose, targeting only a single molecular mechanism involved in the development of contractile dysfunction. As such, this approach often creates side effects associated with interruption of normal physiological processes. It is hypothesized that simultaneous pharmacological reduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS)-dependent PTMs of contractile proteins such as nitration/nitrosylation and/or phosphorylation, together with the pharmacological inhibition of the activity of MMPs, will protect the heart from I/R injury through synergistic or additive drug effects while also enabling lower doses to reduce interruption of normal physiological processes and limit side effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".