MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Identification of genomic DNA signatures predicting relapse in low- and intermediate-risk neuroblastoma using a case control design and high-density SNP genotyping: A Children's Oncology Group (COG) study

2007· article· en· W2314661020 on OpenAlexaff
Edward F. Attiyeh, Yaël P. Mossé, Sharon J. Diskin, Cuiping Hou, Marc A. Attiyeh, David L. Baker, Douglas Strother, Marcin Schmidt, W. B. London, John M. Maris

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLoss of heterozygosityOncologyInternal medicineGenotypingSNP arrayMedicineSNPMalignancySingle-nucleotide polymorphismNeuroblastomaGenotypeGeneticsAlleleBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

9500 Background: Neuroblastoma (NB) is a childhood malignancy with a heterogeneous clinical course. Clinical and genomic markers are powerful predictors of outcome and are used to stratify cases for treatment intensity, but imprecision remains. Methods: We identified all disease recurrences from the recently closed COG low- (P9641: 903 eligible, 63 events) and intermediate-risk (A3961: 467 eligible, 40 events) NB phase III trials. To date, tumor DNA from 35 cases and 90 controls (P9641/A3961 patients without event) was used for whole genome copy number and genotype evaluation on the Illumina HumanHap550 (550K SNPs) array. An in-house algorithm was developed to assign genomic copy number and loss of heterozygosity based on probe intensity (log R ratio) and degree of allelic imbalance (B allele frequency). Results: A total of 988 chromosomal aberrations were identified; 231 (23.4%) were whole chromosome (WC) copy number aberrations (CNA). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering identified 10 tumor subsets, with 2 highly enriched with cases showing progression events (13/21; 61%), and 2 dominated by WC gains (chromosomes 2, 6, 7 and 18) with only 2/20 events. Regional aberrations most highly associated with EFS included loss of 11q14-qter (p=0.036), and gain of 11p (p=0.003), 11q13 (p=0.020), and 17q23-qter (p=0.005). Other regional CNAs at borderline univariate significance for EFS included partial gain at 2p, 2q, 6q, 7q, 12q and 13q. The pattern 11p and proximal 11q gain associated with loss of distal 11q was associated with relapse and death (p=0.006 and p=0.023). Conclusion: Whole genome SNP genotyping detects patterns of chromosomal CNAs predictive of EFS, even in situations where events are rare such as low- and intermediate- risk NB. These data support chromosomal 11 and 17 structural CNAs as being most highly predictive of relapse in otherwise favorable NBs, but also suggest that other CNAs likely cooperate and may improve precisions for risk prediction. These data can be used to identify patients eligible for chemotherapy reduction/elimination, and perhaps others for intensification. Ongoing analyses of the remaining samples will extend these conclusions. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.410
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicNeuroblastoma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207