MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314703545 · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2012-303524.141

L07 The functional rating taskforce for pre-huntington's disease: development of the furst-21 scale

2012· article· en· W2314703545 on OpenAlexaff
Anthony L. Vaccarino, Karen E. Anderson, Beth Borowsky, David Craufurd, John S. Giuliano, Mark Guttman, Aileen K. Ho, G. Bernhard Landwehrmeyer, Jane S. Paulsen, Terrence Sills, Kirsty Evans

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicGenetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
Canadian institutionsCentre for Movement DisordersOvarian Cancer Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRating scaleObservational studyMedicineRasch modelDiseaseClinical psychologyScale (ratio)PsychologyPathologyDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background There is a need for clinical scales specifically designed to measure the earliest clinical manifestations of Huntington disease (HD) and to track early changes in clinical symptoms in HD gene expansion carriers. Such a measurement tool could be used to evaluate the effect of novel therapies early in the course of disease. Aims The Functional Rating Scale Taskforce for pre-HD (FuRST-pHD) is a multinational, multidisciplinary collaboration to develop a valid functional rating scale to assess changes in symptom severity in prodromal (prHD) or early manifest HD gene expansion carriers. Methods FuRST-pHD has established a process for scale development using input from numerous sources, including HD individuals and companions, experts from a variety of fields, as well as from data mining of ongoing observational studies in HD. FuRST-pHD utilised an iterative process in which changes to items are made based on empirical evidence obtained during field testing in prHD and early HD individuals, utilising various types of analyses, including Item Response and Rasch analyses, factor analysis, correlations and descriptive analyses, as well as clinical judgement. The criteria for item reduction and modification include assessment of item discrimination, relevance and response range, item redundancy, and convergent validity. Results A total of 115 structured interview questions were developed to assess the presence and severity of motor, cognitive and psychiatric symptoms, as well as day-to-day functioning. Following multiple testing iterations in 784 prHD/early HD participants, a 40-item FuRST V1.0 was subsequently tested in prHD/early HD gene carriers (n=97), of which 21 items have been retained for inclusion in the primary scale (FuRST-21). Conclusions FuRST-21 is a structured interview that shows promise as a tool to measure symptoms in prHD and early HD. Validation of FuRST-21 is currently in the planning stages.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurology Neurosurgery & PsychiatrySame topicGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesFrench-language works237,207