Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Comparison of the Efficacy of Sertraline as Treatment for a Major Depressive Episode in Patients With Remitted Schizophrenia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effectiveness of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors for depression in remitted schizophrenia has not been clearly demonstrated. A randomized, double-blind, prospective placebo-controlled study was performed of 48 subjects meeting DSM-IV criteria for both schizophrenia in remission and for a major depressive episode. Twenty-seven patients were randomized to placebo and 21 to sertraline. All subjects had a 1-week anticholinergic phase before randomization. The treatment duration was 6 weeks. Sertraline was started at 50 mg/day; this could be increased to 100 mg after 4 weeks for an inadequate response. There were no statistically significant differences in symptoms between the two groups at randomization. There were no differences in outcome between treatment groups. In both groups, between 40% and 50% of subjects showed a 50% reduction in depression score. This study does not provide support for the efficacy of sertraline in the treatment of depression in remitted schizophrenia. The small sample size limits the strength of the conclusions that can be drawn from this study. The study design called for a sample size of 96 on the basis of an expected placebo response rate of 30%. Recruitment for the study was difficult because of the placebo design. The placebo response was 50%. Clinicians and patients underestimate the strength of the placebo response and may overestimate the risk of participating in such a study. Testing the efficacy of widely accepted but poorly evaluated treatments should be a research priority. Future studies require a larger sample size and longer duration of treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it