MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2314839015 · doi:10.1061/40549(276)109

Observations of Surf Beat Propagation and Energetics

2001· article· en· W2314839015 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen M. Henderson, Steve Elgar, A. J. Bowen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCoastal and Marine Dynamics
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSurf zoneBeat (acoustics)GeologyStanding waveEnergy fluxShoreSubmarine pipelineWave setupWave propagationAcousticsOceanographyPhysicsOpticsLongitudinal waveMechanical wave

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Near-bottom pressure and velocity, measured along a cross-shore transect extending from the shore to about 8-m water depth on a barred beach, are used to study the cross-shore propagation of surf beat and the associated cross-shore flux of surf beat energy. The dominant Empirical Orthogonal Functions (EOF's) of pressure fluctuations measured in less than 5 m depth at relatively low beat frequencies (0.005–0.025 Hz) had well developed nodes and antinodes, with ±π phase jumps at the nodes, suggestive of standing wave motions. The dominant EOF's of relatively high frequency surf beat (0.03–0.05 Hz) showed some nodal structure, but their phase increased approximately linearly with distance from the shore indicating net shoreward propagation. EOF's of combined pressure and cross-shore velocity fluctuations at beat frequencies showed a similar mixture of standing and progressive waves. Furthermore, phases between pressure and velocity components were close to ±π/2 at relatively low beat frequencies (< 0.25 Hz), as predicted by standing waves theories, but at higher beat frequencies (0.3–0.05 Hz) phases usually had magnitudes less than π/2, but significantly greater than zero, suggestive of mixed standing and shoreward progressive waves. Shoreward propagating surf beat carried a shoreward energy flux. During a storm, this shoreward flux was about half the flux that could have been carried if all surf beat propagated directly shorewards. The energy carried shoreward by propagating surf beat was lost either at the shoreface (for moderate waves) or on the offshore side of the bar (during a storm). On one occasion surf beat carried energy seawards outside the surf zone and shorewards inside the surf zone, consistent with theoretical models that predict surf beat forcing at the outer edge of the surf zone.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.782

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCoastal and Marine DynamicsFrench-language works237,207