Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cricket is a game that is highly symbolic of modern West Indian achievement. In this paper the ‘no ball’ in cricket is used as a metaphor to highlight the importance of ethical management and leadership in creating influence and growth in these Caribbean nation states. Such ethical leadership can be instrumental in addressing issues of productivity and transforming of the workplace. Business reversals and general meltdown as in the case of billionaire Allen Stanford may be attributable to lack of oversight by an impartial umpire commissioned to identify and rectify the ‘no ball’ of unfair business dealing. Values of social justice and redressing the disadvantage wrought by the unidentified ‘no ball’ are concepts at the heart of the movement to independence in modern Caribbean nation states, as seen in the influence of trade unions on the evolution of that movement in most islands. Ethical leadership is one aspect of social responsibility and creating legitimacy that empowers institutions. The paper also defines the concept of social capital and attempts to relate trust and reciprocity to West Indian society. The implications of identifying unfair advantage and calling the ‘no ball’ are highlighted in the context of altering issues of social justice, trust and mutuality in the culture and management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.209 | 0.093 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".