MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2315070092 · doi:10.1055/s-2006-945587

MANGANESE-INDUCED PARKINSONISM IN CHILDHOOD

2006· article· en· W2315070092 on OpenAlexaff
Paula Brna, Kacy L. Gordon, J. M. Dooley, Victoria Price, Kathleen J. Melanson

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuropediatrics · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHuman Health and Disease
Canadian institutionsIzaak Walton Killam Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineParkinsonismManganesePediatricsInternal medicineMetallurgyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: To review the clinical presentation, routes of exposure and mechanism of manganese-induced neurotoxicity. Methods: A previously healthy 5 year old girl presented with pica, emotional lability and marked gait abnormalities. She had severe iron deficiency anemia and polycythemia. Blood levels of manganese were extremely elevated and MRI showed increased signal in the basal ganglia on T1-weighted images consistent with manganese neurotoxicity. Chelation therapy resulted in improvement in her mobility but she continued to have significant gait impairment. Results: Manganese neurotoxicity is rarely reported in the pediatric literature. There are a few reports with liver disease and TPN-induced toxicity. Occupational exposure is the most common source of manganism in adults. Environmental exposure is the probable source in this pediatric case as other known etiologies have been excluded. The prognosis of manganese neurotoxicity in childhood is uncertain. Conclusion: Manganese neurotoxicity may result in devastating neurologic sequelae in both childhood and adult forms. Exposure to airborne manganese from industrial emissions and fuel-additives remains an important public health concern as the long term effects are unknown.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuropediatricsSame topicHuman Health and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207