MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2315099135

SHORT COMMUNICATION Reestablishment of the species Poeciloneta bellona (Araneae: Linyphiidae)

2010· article· en· W2315099135 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Poeciloneta bellona Chamberlin, Dechesne County

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSpider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinyphiidaeGenusGeographyZoologyNearctic ecozoneTaxonomy (biology)EcologyArchaeologyBiologySpider
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Poeciloneta bellona Chamberlin and Ivie 1943 is removed from synonymy established by Saaristo and Tanasevitch (2000) and re-described using new and existing specimens from the Rocky Mountains. Incestophantes calcaratus (Emerton 1909) is re-described and transfered to Poeciloneta Kulczynski 1894 and a lectotype is designated. The genus Poeciloneta Kulczynski 1894 is an uncommonly collected genus represented by 16 species worldwide, of which 12 species, including the two discussed in this paper, occur in North America (Platnick 2009). The spiders are found throughout Canada, in the northeastern United States, and in the mountains of the western United States. The spiders are usually collected from low branches and shrubs in coniferous forests. Tanasevitch (1989) reviewed the palaearctic species in the genus and noted that Poeciloneta bellona Chamberlin and Ivie 1943 & P. canionis Chamberlin and Ivie 1943, based on the original descriptions, no longer belonged to Poeciloneta, but made no further note as to the placement of the two species. Later Saaristo and Tanasevitch (2000) redefined the Bolyphantes-Poeciloneta genus group and synonymized P. bellona with I. calcaratus (Emerton 1909) transferring the two the species to Incestophantes based on non-type specimens held at the Museum of Comparative Zoology (MCZ), Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Fresh specimens of P. bellona deposited at the Denver Museum of Nature and Science were collected from the Rocky Mountains of Colorado that closely matched Chamberlin and Ivie's (1943) original description and showed clear differences from existing descriptions of P. calcaratus. All applicable specimens were examined from the MCZ collection and it was found that no P. bellona were in the collection, which may account for the mistaken synonymy made by Saaristo and Tanasevitch. Additional specimens used for descriptions and compar- isons came from the arachnid collection of the Denver Museum of Nature and Science, Denver, Colorado (DMNS); the Canadian National Collection, Ottowa, Canada (CNC); and the personal collection of Don Buckle, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada (DB). Inquiries were made as to the location of type material at the American

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.172
Threshold uncertainty score0.249

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpider Taxonomy and Behavior StudiesFrench-language works237,207