Adolescents’ Evaluation of Music Therapy in an Inpatient Psychiatric Unit: A Quality Improvement Project
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Consistent with Quality Improvement initiatives in health care and at Grand River Hospital, a quality assessment of the music therapy program at the Child & Adolescent Mental Health unit was conducted. Medical Students administered the surveys in which youth were asked to rate their experiences with music in general on a 4-point scale, and specifically with this music therapy program on a 5-point scale. Youth were also asked to provide their perceptions of aspects of the music therapy they considered helpful, challenging or needed attention. This report is based on the 72 youth who participated in music therapy and completed an anonymous evaluation survey. The mean age of participants was 14.88 (SD 1.77), 48 (67%) identified as female, and most 57/66 or 86% reported some type of anxiety. Youth indicated that the music therapy was helpful for elevating their mood, reducing anxiety and in socially interacting with others. Suggestions for quality improvement are offered.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".