MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2315169740 · doi:10.1017/s0317167100003747

Localization of Nestin in Amygdaloid Kindled Rat: An Immunoelectron Microscopic Study

2004· article· en· W2315169740 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Toshitaka Nakagawa, Osamu Miyamoto, Najma A. Janjua, Roland N. Auer, Seigo Nagao, Toshifumi Itano

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNestinNeurogenesisBiologyNeuroscienceIntermediate filamentNeuroepithelial cellNeuroinflammationIntermediate Filament ProteinNeural stem cellCell biologyPericytePathologyStem cellEndothelial stem cellMedicineInflammationImmunologyCytoskeletonCell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Nestin is a class VI intermediate filament protein, expressed during early embryonic development in mammals. Postnatally, nestin and its mRNA are down-regulated and gradually disappear. Recently, nestin expression has been detected in the adult nervous system, and it has been suggested that this protein may be related to neurogenesis, although, its role in the mechanism of neurogenesis is not known. METHODS: The present study examined the localization of nestin in CNS tissue of the amygdaloid kindled rat by light and electron microscopy. RESULTS: Kindled animals showed nestin expression mainly in the piriform cortex and the perirhinal cortex. By light microscopy, nestin was shown to be expressed in astrocytes, neurons, and endothelial cells. Electron microscopy demonstrated nestin expression in endothelial cells, astrocytic perivascular end feet, the rare pericyte, neurons and oligodendrocytes. CONCLUSION: We conclude that epilepsy causes widespread nestin expression in many cell types in the CNS, including non-neural cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms→French-language works237,207→