Water-Soluble Substrates of the Peptidoglycan-Modifying Enzyme <i>O-</i>Acetylpeptidoglycan Esterase (Ape1) from <i>Neisseria gonorrheae</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peptidoglycan is the component of the bacterial cell wall that is essential for maintaining the shape and rigidity of the cell. As such, its polymeric structure, consisting of alternating units of N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) and N-acetylmuramic acid (MurNAc), is also a target for the action of host defense enzymes, such as lysozymes. Many bacteria have developed methods of masking their cell wall from these environmental dangers through the addition of aglycon moieties that prevent recognition or sterically hinder the degradative action of exogenous enzymes that would otherwise prove detrimental to the cell. Peptidoglycan acetyl-transferases (Pat's) and O-acetylpeptidoglycan esterases (Ape's) are the enzymes responsible for the controlled addition and removal of acetate onto the C-6 hydroxyl group of MurNAc residues in peptidoglycan. Studies on Ape1, an O-acetylpeptidoglycan esterase found in Neisseria gonorrheae, have suggested that this enzyme is essential for bacterial viability and thus presents an attractive target for antibacterial design. Previous studies on Ape1 have been hindered by the fact that Ape1's natural substrate is an insoluble polymer. In this paper we outline the design, synthesis, and testing of the water-soluble di- and monosaccharide substrate analogues 1 and 2. Both 1 and 2 serve as substrates of Ape1 with k(cat)/K(M) values of (5.1 ± 1.7) × 10(3) M(-1) s(-1) and (3.1 ± 0.8) × 10(3) M(-1) s(-1), respectively. It was determined that the substitution of the GlcNAc residue in compound 1 with an O-benzyl group in compound 2 did not significantly decrease the enzyme's affinity for the monosaccharide. These findings are important as they demonstrate that the catalytic prowess of Ape1 is not dependent on its binding to a polymeric substrate. This ensures that small molecule transition state/intermediate analogues can also capture the transition state binding energy of Ape1 and potentially serve as potent inhibitors. The synthetic route to compounds 1 and 2 could readily be modified to allow for the installation of a wide variety of functional groups at the MurNAc C-6 position in both the mono- and disaccharide scaffolds. This will serve as a general method for the construction of Ape1 substrates and inhibitors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".