MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2315316148 · doi:10.1021/om101152m

Mechanistic Investigation of the Hydrogenation of Ketones Catalyzed by a Ruthenium(II) Complex Featuring an N-Heterocyclic Carbene with a Tethered Primary Amine Donor: Evidence for an Inner Sphere Mechanism

2011· article· en· W2315316148 on OpenAlexaff
Wylie W. N. O, Alan J. Lough, Robert H. Morris

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganometallics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAsymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeterolysisChemistryAcetophenoneRutheniumCatalysisMedicinal chemistryHydrideKetonePhotochemistryConcerted reactionKinetic isotope effectHomolysisCarbeneHydrogenOrganic chemistryDeuteriumRadical

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The complex [Ru( p -cymene)( m -CH 2 NH 2 )Cl]PF 6 ( 1 ) catalyzes the H 2 -hydrogenation of ketones in basic THF under 25 bar of H 2 at 50 °C with a turnover frequency (TOF) of up to 461 h −1 and a maximum conversion of 99%. When the substrate is acetophenone, the TOF decreases significantly as the catalyst to substrate ratio is increased. The rate law was then determined to be rate = k H [Ru] tot [H 2 ]/(1 + K eq [ketone]), and [ 1 ] is equal to [Ru] tot if catalyst decomposition does not occur. This is consistent with the heterolytic splitting of dihydrogen at the active ruthenium species as the rate-determining step. In competition with this reaction is the reversible addition of acetophenone to the active species to give an enolate complex. The transfer to the ketone of a hydride and proton equivalent that are produced in the heterolytic splitting reaction yields the product in a fast, low activation barrier step. The kinetic isotope effect was measured using D 2 gas and acetophenone- d 3, and this gave values ( k H / k D ) of 1.33 ± 0.15 and 1.29 ± 0.15, respectively. The ruthenium hydride complex [Ru( p -cymene)( m -CH 2 NH 2 )H]PF 6 ( 2 ) was prepared, as this was postulated to be a crucial intermediate in the outer-sphere bifunctional mechanism. This is inactive under catalytic conditions unless it is activated by a base. DFT computations suggest that the energy barriers for the addition of dihydrogen, heterolytic splitting of dihydrogen, and concerted transfer of H + /H − to the ketone for the outer-sphere mechanism would be respectively 18.0, 0.2, and 33.5 kcal/mol uphill at 298 K and 1 atm. On the other hand, the energy barriers for an inner-sphere mechanism involving the decoordination of the amine group of the NHC ligand, the heterolytic splitting of dihydrogen across a Ru−O(alkoxide) bond, and hydride migration to the coordinated ketone, are respectively 15.5, 17.5, and 15.6 kcal/mol uphill at 298 K and 1 atm. This is more consistent with the experimental observation that the heterolytic splitting of dihydrogen is the turnover-limiting step. This was confirmed by showing that an analogous complex with a tethered teritiary amine group has comparable activity for the H 2 -hydrogenation of acetophenone. The related complex [Os( p -cymene)( m -CH 2 NH 2 )Cl]PF 6 ( 6 ) was synthesized by a transmetalation reaction with [Ni( m -CH 2 NH 2 ) 2 ](PF 6 ) 2 ( 5 ) and [Os( p -cymene)Cl 2 ] 2, and its catalytic activity toward hydrogenation of acetophenone was also investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.837

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations84
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganometallicsSame topicAsymmetric Hydrogenation and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207